Thursday, 10 May 2018

Interview with Malcolm Pittock, September 2015



Malcolm Pittock interview
Thursday 3 September 2015, Bolton
-----
Born 1930.  His family moved from a hamlet near Selby to Todmorden in 1939.  Married in 1954, moving first to Workington, then Crewe in 1958, a WEA tutor-organiser. Then to Aberdeen in 1963.  Finally comes to Manchester and Bolton in 1974.
Always first and foremost a pacificist, anti-war as the key to all other politics. I registered in 1948 as a conscientious objector.  There was a five year postponement as I went on to do a PhD at Manchester. I appeared before a tribunal in Manchester in 1953, given so-called alternative service in forestry. I appealed and was given an extension to include work in hospitals.  During that time I became an absolutist because ‘alternative service’ accepted the principle that I ought to join the forces. 
My main argument as it has developed is to say that I was brought up to say I must not murder anyone.  All I am doing is to take that teaching and universalise it.  I would put it like this.  The state maintains two incompatible values: that while the life of its own citizens is sacred, the life of the citizens of other states is not if the state so decrees.  As a monist I reject this dualism as being impossible to maintain ethically and intellectually. 
I was called to a magistrate’s court in Todmorden. I didn't go. I had to be arrested and bailed. In court I was asked what are you doing for your country?  I said ‘Appearing here’ .  The crown lawyer was privately quite impressed. I got 6 months in Strangeways. Not for long. I served most of the time in open prison. An old orphanage in Rochdale being converted to an open prison. Most prison governors were ex army officers. Strangeways was an exception; it had a civilian governor, Gilbert Hare. He was always very friendly. I didn't have to have a mug shot or fingerprints taken. I remember him saying if you've been to a boarding school - and I had - you won't find this very different . I was in a heated dormitory, on a sprung bed.  At Ackworth, a Friends’ school, my bed was not sprung while the dormitory was usually unheated even in the terrible winter of 1947.
GB. Are you a member of any organisation as an absolutist? Is there anybody giving you support?
What was his name?  He did give local support. He ran mock tribunals for conscientious objectors. Fred? He was, for a time, chair of the ILP. He was a unionist, Tobacco Workers Union.
GB. You mentioned Korea. Harry Ratner, a Trotskyist active in Salford, gets shouted down at Labour Party Conference when he tries to put a ‘troops out of Korea’ motion
Yes it was pretty dreadful. I didn't take any active part in the opposition at that time. I was opposed to it.  My days of consistent campaigning belong to the days of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the Direct Action Committee against Nuclear War it wasn't the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament that called for the Aldermaston march, it was the Direct Action Committee against nuclear war.  Some of the personalities are still around.  I think Pat Arrowsmith she's very much my age and of course Michael Randle.
GB. Where were you in 1958?
I had moved to Crewe. I tried to form a branch of the CND in late 1958. We did get one going. I managed to get a debate with the Conservative candidate for Crewe with the headmaster of the local grammar school in the chair.  The government had used the WVS to promote the idea of civil defence. I wrote constantly to the Crewe Chronicle and under my wife's name I wrote about the WVS. They came in a body to the debate.  They didn't like my campaigning one little bit.  In fact it was quite clear that I was being blackballed.  The WEA didn’t like my peace activities.  In particular my participation in civil disobedience.  Nor did the Liverpool University Extra Mural Dept. I applied for a job in the ???? and received a letter telling me I wasn’t being considered – an unheard of procedure.  Since I obtained the post of Assistant Lecturer at Aberdeen University at much the same time it was obviously not on academic grounds.  Nor could my organising work be faulted as I was extremely conscientious.  Cold War orthodoxy was particularly strong then.  So my treatment is of historic interest.  I was known as a leading campaigner against the war.  I'd been to a non violent demonstration at Swaffham in Norfolk in December 1958 near where there was going to be a rocket base. I got myself arrested. Unfortunately because of my mother's health I couldn't have gone through with it and gone to prison which I’ve always regretted. But some people did.  I remember Cook and Otter. Otter was an anarchist and he actually fasted in protest the whole fortnight.  So did Cook. I thought it was a splendid thing.
CND had a completely intelligible program but extremely naive. It didn't realise how powerful the establishment was. They were talking about getting their policy accepted in about six months.  They would get the Labour Party Conference to adopt a CND motion. This will mean that the Labour Party will then become unilateralist.  Well of course they did succeed in 1960 because some unions, notably the Transport and General Workers Union, gave support. I'd addressed the Trades Council and I addressed union branches as well.  Gaitskell said ‘Fight, fight and fight again to save the Labour Party I love’.  He never said that what he meant was ‘Fight fight to save the weapons I love’. So they really didn't know what to do. They thought they had succeeded and then it all fell to bits because Gaitskell succeeded in reversing the conference decision the following year. Obviously it continued but I saw that what you had to do was to fight against the Vietnam War.
GB.  Manchester was a regional centre. Were you going from Crewe to the big meetings in the Free Trade Hall?
A coach full went to one of the later ones. I remember the first one, I think in 1958.  The League of Empire Loyalists was around at the time and would intervene when Russell was speaking, saying ‘Bertrand Russell, you are a traitor; the League of Empire Loyalists denounces you as a traitor’ . A very prominent campaigner who may be forgotten was Michael Scott. He came to prominence leading a delegation from an African tribe to the United Nations. He spoke at the Free Trade Hall meeting, supporting the Direct Action Committee and took part in the sit down in Swaffham.  My former wife was actually elected to the steering committee of Greater Manchester and attended meetings. We were very much connected with Manchester. A lot of that history has been forgotten. They did have a full time paid secretary in the early days, Harry Zion and headquarters in Tib Lane.
The leading figure in CND in Manchester at that time was a Methodist minister by the name of Vincent, AJ Vincent. I think he later became the acting head of the Methodist Church.  He also became very prominent in relation to changes in the law governing the trustee Savings Bank.
I became active on the issue of Vietnam when North Vietnam was bombed around 1965 about the British support for it.  I remember a Penguin Special.  There was a university petition which was published. We secured over 200 signatures from Aberdeen.
I haven't mentioned the Committee of 100. They [the CND leadership] were very much in favour of constitutional action and against any kind of direct action.  I was always a believer in direct action and I was invited to be a member of the Committee of 100.  I couldn't really take part in the meetings which were in London.  So I wasn't arrested.  Some of the members, including Russell were.  This was in connection with the Trafalgar Square sit down in September 1961.[1] Some of the prison sentences served by members of the Direct Action Committee were severe. Mike Randle served a year for a demo at Wetherfield and that's how George Blake was sprung.[2]In the end they had to charge Pottle and Randall and in the great tradition of British juries, despite being directed by the judge to find them guilty, there was a not guilty verdict.
GB. The first mass sit down in the northwest was in Manchester in December 1961
Well I was against that development funnily enough because I thought that - I've changed my mind since - direct action should be directed towards something military or at the centre of power. The Committee of 100 was in London. London was the centre of power, perfectly reasonable. People were enthusiastic, sitting in the road.  Well it wasn't quite clear what they were sitting about. Just obstructing traffic. Manchester isn't where decisions are made.  The formation of local Committees of 100 ran into the sand after a brief period and this attempted dilution did for the Committee of 100 project... I thought we're not going to get any further than this. There was support I might say from Manchester University staff in the history department. A chap called Pennington, an authority on the English Civil War was chair and there was a Marxist historian who was a supporter of direct action. Pennington wasn't.
My position on nuclear weapons was concern whether we were going to use them; it arose from my moral objection to their conditional use, not the dangers of their use on us. In the Cuban missile crisis, Pat Arrowsmith fled to Ireland because she was expecting a nuclear war. I wasn't frightened at all. What drives me up the wall is the idea of killing. A French general argued that the world would only be safe if everybody had nuclear weapons. Their purpose it was claimed was to deter war, to deter attack, so when Russian nuclear missiles were established in Cuba, the Americans should have said 'They're deterring our aggression'. It's the same now. Iran's nuclear weapons are a threat. But ours are not! I don't understand how people don't see that either everybody should have them or nobody should have them. They can't say that we can have them but you can't because you're a danger and we're not.
GB. Any memories of songs or films that were important at the time?
I don't sing and I don't chant slogans. I'm there and that's what matters. But we did have Aldermaston songs, 'Don’t you hear the H bomb’s thunder?' and 'If I had a hammer' and, though it wasn't a CND song, it was adapted. 'The saints go marching in'. One outstanding poem – though that was later[3] - is Adrian Mitchell's 'Tell me lies'.  If you read it carefully, it's amazing. You know that you're trying to protect yourself with all kinds of distractions and an increasing armoury of lies.  Later on the most influential thinker is Noam Chomsky.  I'm associated with Peace news. Peace news is an anarchist pacifist newspaper
There was a very big universities petition about 1967 or 68. I worked very hard to get signatures - I was working at Aberdeen University - 200 signatures or something like that.  For some time I was chair of the Committee for Peace in Vietnam. I worked with Owen Dudley Edwards who became quite a radio personality.  He wrote a column in the Irish Times.  Another prominent one was Ray Newton. He's still around and is now a Green. He was a very strong communist. He actually drove one of those gas Russian cars . The Socialist Workers Party I can work with - we differ on revolutionary violence - and I do work with many members of the Socialist Workers Party.  A number of them are my personal friends.  One of the people I became aware of and worked with in Crewe - he lived somewhere near Stoke - was Raymond Challinor, a member of the International Socialists.  Ray Challinor worked in a secondary modern school. I used to write a lot of references for him.  He wanted to get out of teaching in a secondary modern; he wanted to get into adult education.  After all he ended up as head of history in one of the new polytechnics and he has some good books to his name.  He used the head of his department, I think, for references and then somebody took him aside and told him that the head of department have been consistently blackballing him in his references.  In other words he got an anti reference which of course prevented him from getting anywhere until he found out .  He was 'Neither Washington nor Moscow but International Socialism'.  The Communist Party was very different.  Stan Broadbridge was the treasurer of Manchester and District CND. Later he became the general secretary of ATTI (precursor of NATFHE/UCU). He was a very strong communist.  The communists didn't mind Soviet nuclear weapons. It was British nuclear weapons [they opposed].  In other words a lot of the communist effort - not completely - was really forming an arm of Soviet foreign policy and this came out on one of the Aldermaston marches.  The Russians had tested an enormous bomb - I think it was 50 megatons - and Stan Broadbridge was defending it . That was always a difficulty in those days and it did give grounds for propaganda against CND.  It's very difficult to make any propaganda against the position of Stop the War or CND now. Communist support for the Soviet Union only really started to break up with the invasion of Czechoslovakia.  Then they clearly condemned that. That made them independent; it was the beginning of Euro communism. Another influence on me, a figure who I regard as a forerunner of Chomsky was C Wright Mills, 'The causes of World War II'.  I also read 'The Power Elite'. He had the same hard-hitting radicalism as Chomsky and was also a friend of EP Thompson.
GB. What about the internationalist dimension?
Internationalism was always there.  Other movements fed that into that. The agitation against apartheid in South Africa: some people concentrated on that - you can't do everything - but that doesn't mean they didn't support CND. The anti-austerity movement today has fed into CND. Jeremy Corbyn's popularity was inconceivable only a year or two ago.  I lived in Scotland- I always was in favour of Scottish nationalism.  What I notice about the Scottish Nationalists is that they are very much to the left.  They don't support foreign wars and they don't support Trident.
I would call myself a socialist anarchist which is more or less the position of Chomsky.  You need the state for some things but it is the state - human wickedness is to a large extent the product of the State - which gets you to believe the lies, the propaganda. If you tell people, for instance, that the Russians are coming -  there was never any evidence whatsoever that the Russians were coming, that they were going to occupy the United States or Britain or Western Europe, none whatever - people believed it. People believed Iraq had nuclear weapons despite the terrible sanctions regime but that's because the state controls the propaganda.  The BBC is supposed to be neutral. It isn't of course - see the Glasgow Media Group.  When Andrew Marr said Blair can stand tall because they started bombing Iraq, that's not impartial.  On Newsnight, say views range from A to Z, on Newsnight they will range from A to D. They are always having generals and ex foreign secretaries.
GB.  About the Vietnam movement...
I wasn't on the big demonstration - I was in Aberdeen at the time -   but it was increasingly involved with some kind of kind of minor violence which put me off.  You say the Americans lost [the war in Vietnam] but there is a counter argument that they actually won because they ensure that Vietnam became a carrier of world capitalism just like China.
I still do some work with my old, perhaps my oldest, friend Derek Tatton.  He is the administrator of Raymond Williams Foundation.  He had written a letter to the Crewe Chronicle, this was in the early days of CND. I went to see him and his family. He came to my WEA classes.  He joined the CND.  I introduced him to the work of Raymond Williams who was a big influence on me as well.  He was interesting because he went to a sort of Welsh equivalent of Ruskin - College Harlech - and he managed to get into Cambridge as an adult student. He got in on the basis of an essay he'd written. There, of course, he had Raymond Williams as a tutor.  The point is that Raymond Williams was a railway man's son, Tatton was a railwayman's son and he clearly favoured Derek - and this is a black mark against Williams - apparently in Oxbridge you can farm out your research students. David Hare wrote a very bitter article in the Guardian about how he had gone to Cambridge to be under Raymond Williams and he was fobbed off. Derek did a PhD with the Open University.  Raymond Williams was not a supervisor; he had no duties to Derek. Derek asked him to supervise and he did.  With Derek he went beyond the call of duty.  That shows you the rapport between the two men. He still does good work with the Raymond Williams Foundation which is exceptionally good. We have bi annual conferences at Wortley Hall near Sheffield and he's got things going elsewhere as well.

Additional note on Alfred, uncle by marriage. 
Alfred was married to my wife’s sister. He was one of the so-called 'Frenchmen', those that were sent under military orders to France with the idea that they would be broken or executed.  My uncle Alfred was 21, absolutely working class, he was a piano tuner by trade and he was a Roman Catholic at that time. He got spat at at mass.  Yet he went through with it. They were sentenced to death by Earl Haig, a great Christian, a great Presbyterian. He did it on religious grounds, he worked it out for himself and he was without real support. Earl Haig was countermanded at the last moment by Asquith. He wouldn't allow the sentences to be carried out but Haig milked it for all it was worth. They were sentenced to be executed and then were told it had been commuted to 10 year’s penal servitude.  He did accept a couple of Home Office schemes which enabled him and others to be released from prison but he went permanently back inside when he found that on the last scheme, workers were not being paid the going rate, so he refused to work for a company that wasn't going to pay him properly.  He appealed for support to the conscientious objectors board.  The only one that supported him was Bertrand Russell.  He wrote to Bertrand Russell years after and Russell remembered him.  He goes to prison for his opposition to the war, he goes to prison again for taking industrial action.  There's a very good example of the two sources of objection to the war. I was very familiar with him.  He refused to fire watch in the Second World War.  Later he became registered blind. But before this his sight was very bad indeed.  There was a botched operation on his eyes so he couldn't possibly have been any good as a fire watcher but he never pleaded he would be no good at it, he did it on principle.



SUPPLEMENTARY
The policy of the Direct Action Committee. was not only to sit down at rocket bases, which were often under construction at the time, but to picket such bases for weeks at a time and to try to persuade those looking for work on the base not to seek it, suggesting alternative employment. The DAC also tried to promote strike action by the unions and Pat Arrowsmith worked for several weeks in the North West promoting strike action against nuclear weapons and she did, I think, actually get a number of workmen to absent themselves from work on a particular day - but it was hardly strike action. If you read Lewis Grassic Gibbon's novel Grey Granite (the third novel in The Scots Quair, ) you will find a good fictional account of an attempt to encourage strike action in relation to a particular international situation which had no direct bearing on the workers' economic interests and its complete failure. The fact that in relation of the West’s attempt to intervene in the civil war in Russia, workers did take industrial action to stop it, has led campaigners to believe that it could happen again. But it never has — not in this country at any rate.
Another tactic adopted by Direct Action Committee was to encourage voters to abstain from voting for pro nuclear weapons Parliamentary candidates. This was a complete failure — but I remember the Voters’ Veto campaign well.
As far as the Campaign in Crewe was concerned, we did try to carry our message to the ordinary workers: I addressed the Trades Council and several Union branches, and whenever marchers or other campaigners came through Crewe, we tried to ensure that they addressed workers at the large locomotive works in their dinner hour. This stress on workers' action faded away after 1961 and the formation of the Committee of 100, with which the Direct Action Committee merged.
I forgot to mention the high point of the Committee of 100 after which decline set in very rapidly as the committee split into local committees. It was September 1961 when two demonstrations were organised more or less on the same day, one against Polaris at Holy Loch (though I am not sure whether it involved Direct Action) while the other was a huge sitdown in Trafalgar Square. Fifty or so of the Committee had been arrested prior to this demonstration including Bertrand Russell and were imprisoned
My friend Derek Tatton, ( whom you can get in touch with ) went to the Holy Loch demonstration and there remembers meeting AS Neil, the well known educationist. Indeed, one of the features of the September demonstration was the number of celebrities that were involved. I was arrested along with a student who later became Professor Sir Adam Roberts at I think Oxford and a pillar of the establishment, who actually supported the invasion of Iraq, and wrote a paper for a Parliamentary committee justifying it on tortuous and completely spurious 'Legal’ grounds. Bizarrely this pillar of the Establishment was once the Editor of Peace News! I was told that there was a special chair in the square for Augustus John and the author of ‘Look back in Anger’ sent a message of support. When I appeared at the magistrates court after my own arrest, I distinctly remembered noting that one of my co- defendants was Doris Lessing (I recognised her from her photograph) Then I remember — I think they were arrested for being members of the Committee of 100 — both Arnold Wesker and Robert BoIt being imprisoned and Bolt having to yield since he was writing the screenplay for Lawrence of Arabia and I think the film company wanted it completed, but the authorities wouldn't let him work in prison.
In those early days campaigners thought that if public figures were converted to the cause of unilateralism, they would stay that way. But experience was to show that was far from being the case. Professor Sir Adam Roberts was only an extreme example of what was to happen increasingly.
But there was something about those days which could lead to the totally unexpected and unrepeatable. I remember purchasing a rail ticket for the short journey to Holy Loch, And what did it say on the ticket? 'Anti Polaris D.' British Rail had issued a special ticket for protesters.' It is a small point, but I cannot think of anything more remote from what would be possible today.




[1] See Supplementary Note below.
[2] See ‘The Blake Escape: How We Freed George Blake - and Why’, Michael Randle and Pat Pottle, 1989
[3] First read publicly in Trafalgar Square in 1964 , see http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2008/dec/22/adrian-mitchell-vietnam

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

No comments: