Showing posts with label greed exploitation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label greed exploitation. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 April 2015

San Francisco, Manchester and Shenzen

With the largest concentration of geeks in the world, something like four hundred thousand hi-tech workers, the Bay area, centred on San Francisco, is a seriously interesting place.  Just sitting in cafés puts you in touch with the buzz of people putting ideas together. Sometimes they will manage to hook up with venture capitalists, angel investors and the like, ready to risk their money and a start up will be born. Everyone knows that around 90 percent of start-ups fail, maybe 95%., but everyone also has a story about those who succeed, or could have succeeded if they'd taken up the offer of stock instead of cash when offered by one of the founders of Google, Facebook, Twitter or Apple or the like. Those that have made it are the force to beat in a world where is difficult to find any city whose leaders aren't trying to build up its science park, or business start ups working with techies. 

Two hundred years ago it was Manchester that performed this role of being the most exciting place on the planet when it came to shaping its future.  The world's first industrial city, 'the city of a thousand chimneys', people came from around the world to be part of it.  Marx's collaborator Frederick Engels, was one of a thousand Germans who lived in the city.  Writers such as the French aristocrat, Alexis de Tocqueville, and novelists such as the future prime minister Benjamin Disraeli and Elizabeth Gaskell wrote about this amazing development.  What everyone commented on was the creation of such vast quantities of wealth in conditions of such appalling exploitation and squalor.

What a contrast to today's San Francisco. Homeless people on many street corners, the local press full of stories of the rising rents squeezing the less fortunate out of the city.  The inequality is there: California spends more on prisons than it does on education and the prison population is disproportionately black. The techies are overwhelmingly white and male.  But something is missing: no chimneys, no smoke and little dirt.   And the answer quite simply is that the chimneys and the dirt are in China.  The I-phone is produced by Foxconn, a Taiwanese company. Its largest factory is in Shenzen, not far from Hongkong employing around 300,000 workers (estimates vary).  So there's the contrast: two hundred years ago the techies worked alongside the spinners and weavers and all the other trades producing the textiles. Today these two groups are  on opposite sides of the globe.

Where does the power lie? With the interconnectedness, the likelihood is that even small groups of workers, whether in Silicon Valley or Shenzen, are potentially strong. But as I remember it, at Cowley, producing motor cars in the early 1970s, they used to say that the closer you are to the finished product the more powerful you are.  I would be surprised if that wasn't still true today.

Monday, 16 September 2013

On the insatiable greed of a bunch of plunder-hungry Oligarchs

Hani Shukrullah's excellent 'People's History of the Egyptian Revolution'  - http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContentP/4/81690/Opinion/A-people%E2%80%99s-history-of-the-Egyptian-revolution-.aspx - talks of the failure of the Muslim Brotherhood in their year in government to make a single attempt
"to deal with the massive inequities of a nation lorded over by the insatiable greed of a bunch of plunder-hungry Oligarchs with one foot in the state, the other in business, producing next to nothing, but consuming voraciously.

While it's true that the Oligarch as individuals produce nothing, I think that this is a little one-sided to omit the Oligarchs' need to exploit their workers which in turn requires that they invest in the machinery and raw materials needed to make what will be sold - it is hoped - at a profit.  As Marx points out, the capitalist's own consumption is a robbery on the process of accumulation.  However, he also talks of 'the prestige cost of capital', that is, the expenditure of making the business (and its owner) look  credible. Banks have to have posh facades. And, no doubt, Oligarch's need huge houses, yachts etc.

What is certainly true is that there is an insatiability at the heart of each and every Oligarch. Insatiability usually goes with a narrow focus on the object of desire and an inability to look at the big picture.  That is, an inability to see the massive destructiveness of their pursuit of profit, destroying both the human beings caught up as workers and consumers and also destroying the natural world, an inability to see the unsustainability of it all. The uprising that started on 25 January saw the masses step onto the stage of history.  They are still there. The revolution,  for that is what it is, whatever Hugh Roberts might argue - http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n17/hugh-roberts/the-revolution-that-wasnt  - more of that anon - has arisen precisely out of the need to stand up to the insatiable voraciousness of our rulers.